Killer Whale Tilikum: Beauty & the Beast

Above: Vintage orca photo of something not done much these days.

Orcinus orca is a beautiful and majestic animal but the species also hunts and kills with skill and innovation.

Basically, beauty and beast combine into one powerful predator known as the killer whale or orca.

Tilikum made headlines all over the world when he killed orca trainer Dawn Brancheau.

What disturbed me about this incident was that all of the mainsteam media commentaries got out of hand and most of those comments, with the exception of one, were made by people who had not seen the footage of the killer whale incident.

It used to be that you could rely on the news anchors to have some sort of journalist ethics but today those seem to be sadly missing in mainstream media and have been replaced with personal opinions and commentaries spouted carelessly in a variety of mediums.

Hopefully we won’t see the footage of the orca attack and I guess I should not be surprised that the media would seek legal avenues to get their hands on it.

But aren’t there are more important things going on in the world above and beyond the morbid fascination of one person’s death by a captive predator?

Anyway I was shaking my head over comments such as:

  • Tilikum was only playing.
  • Sea World’s killer whale mistook the orca trainer’s pony tail for a novel object (toy).
  • It was the trainer’s fault that she was attacked.
  • Wild killer whales have never attacked a human.

Okay, so consider why I think all of those statements are cr**:

Tilikum was only playing: Most professionals worth their salt would question this statement. First, you have to ask why we have not seen play behavior like this before? Also, the reference the expert made was actually about footage of a killer whale “toying” with seals it was hunting.

Sea World’s killer whale mistook the orca trainer’s pony tail for a novel object (toy): Because this trainer had worked with Tilikum for some time, with the same hair length, I question this statement. Yes, some species will grab what they can—hair decorations, jewelry, etc., but to believe this animal did not recognize or distinguish this element of his trainer’s appearance is not something that rings true. Plus, I have to ask—did he really grab her pony tail?

It was the marine mammal trainer’s fault that she was attacked: First, to make that statement on national television when no investigation had been done was irresponsible. But in my experience, in many cases, captive animal incidences are related to human error or equipment failure. For instance, a human goes into an environment of a predator that is not trained to accept that and gets killed. So, I don’t categorize this incident as trainer error in that respect–but unless we see the video all we can do is speculate and wait for the investigation to conclude. The killer whale trainer was on the slide out (a shallow platform where animals can slide out in a few inches of water) and just what positioning and proximity to the animal was protocol or not remains to be revealed.

Wild killer whales have never attacked a human so this is abnormal behavior: This is something that a lot of people want to believe but it isn’t true. In fact, how many wild orca incidents do we not know about? I have to also say that the public and OSHA only see the captive incidents that are reported or result in injury.

Medical Examiner’s Report

Now, I’d like to share a few statements from the medical examiner’s report to remove any illusions you might have about it.

I’ve read and have a copy of the final autopsy that states the killer whale trainer died as the result of drowning and traumatic injuries.

The autopsy report reveals that her spinal cord was fractured and that her body was covered in cuts and bruises.

Avulsion is the polite medical term for a ripping or tearing of the skin or body part (like from bites) and the report identifies areas with that type of injury and also blunt force trauma injuries.

The summary?

Multiple fractures to her back, ribs, legs, arms and face. The left arm was torn off along with part of her scalp.

Granted, a 12,300 pound mammal packs a lot of power, and perhaps you’ve seen other footage of other orca trainers that have been knocked around by killer whales, but I’ve seen orcas go after their trainers lots of times–and my point is that most are not dead.

In fact, why we don’t see more of these types of incidents is probably due to the fact that animal trainers are humans (who are land animals) and spend very little time in the same environment as the captive killer whales.

Remember that he grabbed her.

In an article published at USA Today, Mike Wald, a spokesman for OSHA’s Southeast Region talked with reporters.

USA today perused records and believes that state and federal records shows similar patterns of orca behavior in earlier incidents on other trainers—it sure would be nice to see the citations.

In my past research, I’ve also seen lower level incidents prior to escalated ones–but not always.

Toy or Predator?
One of the big frustrations in the animal profession stem from the gross misunderstanding as to who and what animals (of all types) are really like.

In fact, the Daniel P Duke family (he was killed in 1999–see below) actually sued Sea World, alleging the dangerous orca was portrayed as a huggable stuffed toy. (The lawsuit was quickly dropped.)

People want to believe that wild creatures are benevolent to humans and so tend to anthropomorphize (attribute human traits and motivations to them) instead of understanding the real animal and their animal nature.

Motion pictures and theme parks don’t help and perpetuate some of those illusions.

The fact of the matter remains–killer whales are adept predators. (I know you must be sick of hearing this from me but seriously, humans need to get that into their skulls.)

Killer whales kill things to eat, experiment with hunting strategies, and use their brains to help them to adapt better ways to dispatch their prey.

Tilikum the Killer Whale
Tilikum was captured in Iceland in November of 1983 and delivered to, the now defunct, Sealand of Pacific in Victoria, British-Columbia.

Today he resides at Sea World of Florida and is the largest killer whale in captivity (22 feet and 12, 300 pounds).

He can be recognized by his dorsal fin which has folded over and also from two thin, small black markings on both his eye patches.

This orca is also know by his associaton with two other fatal incidents.

In case you are not familiar with this animal’s history, here are the three main incidents we know about:

February 21, 1991: A part-time marine mammal trainer fell into the orca tank at Sealand of the Pacific in British Columbia, Canada. At that time trainers were not allowed in the water with the whales. The three whales grabbed, thrashed, and submerged 20-year-old female trainer Keltie Byrene until she was dead. All three killer whales involved in the incident were purchased by Sea World and Tilikum was moved to Sea World in Orlando, Florida in 1992.

July 6 1999: The body of a 27-year-old South Carolina man was recovered from the back of Tilikum. Daniel P. Dukes managed elude security and remained in the park after operating hours and was found dead in the morning when staff arrived. Authorities were not sure if he jumped, fell, or was pulled into the whale breeding tank since there were no witnesses or surveillance cameras.

February 24, 2010: Tilikum grabbed 40-year-old Dawn Brancheau and pulled her beneath the water as dozens of tourists attending the Dine with Shamu event watched. Witnesses report that she was pulled in by her arm, by the waist, and by the pony tail.

Here are a few animal attack incidents from 200o until present from USA Today.

I have more to discuss but that will have to do it for now. Below you can find the emergency call recordings from the 2010 orca incident.

911 Call Sea World Incident



I’ll have more comments in the next installment…leave any of yours below.

EPA Flea Product Study Results Available

Flea Control Secrets ebookThe long overdue results from the Office of Pesticides Program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to make significant changes when it comes to spot-on products.

Ya think?

I wrote about this in the eBook Flea Control Secrets and anticipated the results last fall at the latest.

Today it was announced that there will be an increased scrutiny of flea treatment products, specifically spot-on treatments.

The spot-on flea treatment product investigation results were introduced on March 17, 2010 when the EPA conducted an online flea treatment webinar to discuss their findings from the investigation that I mentioned last year—and have been waiting for.

The investigation was sparked by reports of injury and deaths occurring from over the counter flea and tick products.

The agency is inviting public comment about how to implement their new measures. You can view the Federal Register notice announcing the opening of docket number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0229.

Take a moment to voice your concerns and opinions now.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) and Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) collaborated on this study.

The results found dermal, gastrointestinal and neurological reactions were the most commonly reported complications.

What disturbed me was that the initial posting (listed in Flea Control Secrets) was removed from the EPA website.

Was it pressure from manufacturers of these products?

In addition to looking at the REPORTED incidents involving cats and dogs, and at both the active and inert ingredients, and finally evaluated product labeling.

Some of the problems involved inconsistent reports on adverse reactions and information reported by pet owners.

Also, incidents that weren’t included in the EPA’s evaluation were those from products without EPA registration numbers, those that were vague, and those that were not able to be identified as a specific pesticides or drugs because a combination meant that a reaction couldn’t be definitively tied to a specific product.

In addition, incidents that involving multiple animals were not included because many of these could not be accurately identified.

So, in the great, vague, non-committal way the government seems to be operating these days, the EPA stated that their evaluation indicated that additional restrictions should be applied to these products.

Uh, we knew that already.

Ultimately, the public comment period is vital since, there are a variety of ideas they will implement—such as different packaging, clearer warnings, etc.

It is not clear if restrictions will apply to over-the-counter products, prescription products or both.

Findings included:

  • Small breed dogs were affected more often than medium and large breed dogs.
  • Dogs affected over three years of age were significant.
  • Younger cats affected were significant.
  • Products containing cyphenothrin and permethrin stood out.
  • Dosage ranges are currently too broad and may need refinement.

I find it interesting that blame is being passed on to the consumer once again since the EPA emphasized the importance of following the manufacturer’s directions carefully, suggesting that misapplication may have be a major contributor to incidents, and that the misuse of dog products on cats or splitting a tube between animals was a concern.

Unrevealed information includes inert ingredients (unlisted and often proprietary additives) which are indicated as an important factor in adverse reactions.

You can find a list of the flea treatment product/manufacturer by number here.

The analysis was done with percentages to omit any bias based on sales and differences in product popularity and use differences.

Meaning, that a popular product may show more incidents versus a less popular product.

How do you feel about that?

Many people want to see all the numbers of incidents, ingredients, etc.

However, the EPA noted that deaths and adverse incidents were reported for all the products included in the study.

Flea Treatment Safety Steps YOU Can Take

  • Consult your veterinarian before using any product.
  • Do not purchase flea treatment products from suspect suppliers (such as online) as counterfeit flea treatment is a problem.
  • Read the manufacturer’s instructions and entire label (follow the directions as detailed).
  • Pay attention to warnings and use caution on weak, elderly, sick, pregnant, or nursing pets.
  • Follow age restrictions.
  • Weigh your pet before application and follow weight restrictions on package–and err on the low side.
  • Follow species specific practices. Only use a dog product on a dog and a cat product on a cat.
  • Keep the package and record the dates and times you treat your pet. Lot numbers and product data is vital if your pet has an adverse reaction.
  • Use a flea treatment product on a pet when you are going to be present so you can watch your pet and identify an adverse reaction quickly if it happens.
  • Call your veterinarian immediately if your pet has symptoms of an adverse reaction.
  • You can also call an emergency clinic or the Animal Poison Control Center at (888) 426-4435.

EPA Flea Control Product Investigation Links

Go now and give your public comment on flea treatment products to the EPA or you can contact individuals involved in this process:

• Kimberly Nesci, MS US EPA, Registration Division (reach her with questions at pets@epa.gov)
• Lois Rossi, MS US EPA, Director, Registration Division
• Kit Farwell, DVM US EPA, Health Effects Division

This post is a reprint from Flea Control Secrets blog. Please feel free to distribute this post or republish it as long as you keep it intact. You can purchase Flea Control Secrets eBook here.